Justice Department opens inquiry into E. Jean Carroll, woman who won Trump sex case

THE NEW YORK TIMES: The Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll, the former magazine writer who won a civil case over allegations she was sexually assaulted by Donald Trump.

The Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll, the 82-year-old former magazine writer who accused President Donald Trump of sexual assault, according to a person with direct knowledge of the situation.

May be an image of text that says 'N 已 USPOLITICS Woman who won Trump sex abuse case under investigation'

The investigation is believed to center on whether Carroll committed perjury in lawsuits against Trump, according to the person, who requested anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation. Carroll won a $5 million civil judgment against Trump that he had sexually abused and defamed her, which the president in November asked the Supreme Court to overturn.

Andrew Boutros, the Trump-appointed U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, opened the inquiry, according to the person with knowledge of the situation. The existence of the investigation was reported earlier by CNN.

Carroll’s lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

E. Jean Carroll is a former magazine writer who won a civil case over allegations she was sexually assaulted by Donald Trump.

Todd Blanche, the acting attorney general, who has approved a growing number of inquiries into the president’s enemies, is said to have recused himself from the probe because of his representation of Trump in the Carroll case.

In May 2023, a federal jury in New York found Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. The jury also found that Trump had defamed her by saying on his social media site that her case was a hoax and a lie.

Trump won a delay this month in another defamation case in which Carroll was awarded $83 million. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Trump did not have to pay the judgment, as he intends to appeal to the Supreme Court.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *